In 1965, Congress enacted the Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) for the purpose of “helping preserve, develop, and assure access to outdoor recreation facilities to strengthen the health of U.S. citizens.” LWCF is much more than a federal land acquisition program and provides considerable benefit to local communities. Recognizing that not all communities host a national park or federal lands and that the purpose of this program would most likely be achieved at the local level, Congress created the LWCF State Assistance program- a dollar-for-dollar matching grant program that assists states and localities in recreational planning and development of outdoor recreational areas.
The LWCF State Assistance program funds a wide array of projects ranging in scope from land acquisition for parks, playgrounds or recreational areas; ADA compliance projects; to the construction of restrooms, picnic areas, campgrounds, lighting and much more.
Under the existing formula, funding decisions are left to the states. Currently, Congress annually appropriates a designated amount to the State Assistance program. 40% of the appropriated amount is equally divided among all the states and territories. The remaining 60% is primarily allocated based on state population. Localities then submit project funding requests to the state which has the discretion to decide which projects receive funding. The success of the State Assistance program is due, in part, to the fact that someone sitting in Washington, DC is not deciding which local projects should be funded. Instead, state officials who are familiar with the needs of the state and local communities make the funding decisions based on those needs.
The Department of Interior (DOI) is working to change the current distribution formula in a way that would decrease the amount of funding that annually flows to states and the localities within those states. DOI’s proposal continues to equally allocate 40% of the State Assistance funding among all the states and territories. However, the 60% of the funding would be under the control of DOI and would be allocated through a national competitive grant program. This portion of the funding would no longer be spread out among ALL states; it would likely go to only a few states. While states will submit a list of projects, DOI will have sole discretion over which projects are funded by the competitive grant program.
States can currently decide which projects to fund based on their priorities, but DOI’s competitive grant program will fund only those projects that that meet the priorities of the Administration which are urban parks, large scale conservation, and blueways. Assumingly, this means that small projects like ball fields and playgrounds in local communities will not eligible for funding through the competitive grant program. Using 60% of LWCF State Assistance funding for the Administration’s priorities will yield less funding for small projects, will create greater competition for limited funds, and will ultimately result in the fewer projects being funded at the local level.
For instance, in FY11 $37.4 million was allocated to states through the State Assistance program and Florida received approximately $1.6 million. A DOI grant program based on $37.4 million would equally divide $14.8 million among all the states. So Florida, just like every other state, would receive approximately $292,000 but would be at considerable risk for losing $1.4 million at a time when it is reporting $32 million in unmet need.
Allowing DOI to use the bulk of LWCF State Assistance funding for projects of its choosing at a time when local park and recreation agencies in every state throughout the country is in need of funding just doesn’t make sense or achieve the original intent of the program.
The National Recreation and Park Association encourages local governments to discuss this issue with your Governor’s office and to ask your Member of Congress to ensure the distribution formula is not changed.
By Stacey Pine, Guest Author
(Stacey Pine is Chief Government Affairs Officer for the National Recreation and Park Association (NRPA), a national organization that is dedicated to educating professionals and the public on the essential nature of parks and recreation. NRPA advocates for increased national funding for parks and recreation through federal grants and initiatives that support healthy lifestyles, economic vitality and environmental stewardship. )