Numerous organizations have documented that the nation’s water infrastructure is aging and that we must increase the levels of investment to protect public health and safety, maintain environmental standards and avoid the economic losses caused by failing to act, including significant job losses. With a Water Infrastructure Finance and Innovation (WIFIA) plan modeled after the successful Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA), such a mechanism could lower the cost of capital for water utilities while having little or no long-term effect on the federal debt. Senator Jeff Merkley (D-OR) looks to be acting on this need by introducing his take on a water infrastructure bill.
Water infrastructure “is not the sexiest thing, but it’s essential”, Oregon State Treasurer Ted Wheeler said at the Portland Water Bureau’s Operations, Maintenance and Construction Facility on August 23 during Sen. Merkley’s WIFIA legislation unveiling. Sen. Merkley is taking the water infrastructure challenge head-on with his new WIFIA bill. WIFIA is intended to increase investments in infrastructure while maintaining the lowest possible cost and risk to both public and private water utilities by using currently low interest rates. Currently, the overwhelming majority of funds invested in water infrastructure come from state and local sources.
Sen. Merkley didn’t discuss the specifics of the bill during his announcement, but reportedly the bill will be based off of a draft WIFIA bill proposed by Representative Bob Gibbs (R-OH). It is rumored, according to a report from the Association of Metropolitan Water Agencies (AMWA), that Senator Merkley’s bill may also include provisions to promote “green infrastructure” and will allow water infrastructure projects of all sizes to compete for funding.
Sen. Merkley expects to formally introduce his WIFIA bill after Congress returns to session from their August recess, sometime after Labor Day. Rep. Gibbs, who chairs the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee on Water Resources and Environment and whose subcommittee held hearings on WIFIA and other water project financing alternatives earlier this year, may introduce his version of WIFIA in September as well.
According to a report prepared by the AMWA, the American Water Works Association and the Water Environment Federation, even at a 30-year WIFIA loan repayment period (most folks hope for a 35 to 40-year repayment period) and a 1.36 percent spread between municipal rates and WIFIA rates (currently TIFIA rates are set at 2.73 percent and double AA municipal rates nationwide are 4.05 percent), that would generate savings that would provide the same value as a grant equal to 16 percent of a project’s total costs.
What is your view? Would WIFIA help your community accelerate work on much needed water infrastructure projects?